Quill and writing

The Contemporary Church is R – Reductionistic

The Churches, we have seen, are full of pigmy Christians who refuse to grow up! Nowhere is this more apparent than in the (few) Christian bookshops that still exist in the highstreets.  [God has most likely removed them for their compromise to significant/meaningful truth!]. The reductionism that characterises contemporary ‘churchianity’ is exemplified by the way the Bible is routinely expounded in weekly sermons.  I became frankly tired of how almost every passage was ‘applied’ and given this interpretation: you’re a sinner; trust in Jesus to be Your Saviour!

I want to illustrate what I mean by referencing principled French Huguenots – a despised but intellectually astute group of Protestant believers seeking to enlighten French society with Scripture four hundred and fifty years ago. Great swathes (approx. 20,000) of them were cruelly obliterated in the ‘St Bartholomew’s Day Massacre’ of 1572. Let us briefly unpack one of their great literary achievements: Vindicae Contra Tyrannos (VCT – 1579) a popular tract attributed to Junius Brutus. It’s hard to comprehend the political turmoil of that era. As elsewhere throughout Europe, God’s truth was marching on, and Popish tyranny was being slowly overturned. The prevalent worldview was ‘medieval (humanistic) Christendom’. Few subscribed to post-Enlightenment secular humanism which today underpins western civilisation. VCT addressed the Biblical warrant of standing up to political/religious tyranny.

VCT comprises four questions and furnishes them with Biblically grounded answers.

  • Q1. Are subjects required or even obligated to obey Prices, if they command that which is against the Law of God?
  • Q2. Is it lawful to resist a Prince who actively (or only passively) resists God’s Word and His Church? By whom, and how far, is it lawful?
  • Q3. Is it lawful to resist a Prince who actively (or passively) works to destroy the civil order? To what extent, by whom and how is resistance permitted?
  • Q4. Are princes to give aid to the subjects of another Prince, if those people are afflicted because of their Christian faith or oppressed by obvious tyranny?

I want to summarise TWO of the arguments employed in Vindicae and contrast the exposition of referenced passages with how they are dealt with by typical evangelicals today. I hope my reader appreciates my use of sarcasm/satire here!

QuestionScripture Passage(s)16th century Exposition/application by Brutus in Vindicae…Modern Evangelical exposition
1aActs 4:18-20; Hos 5:10,11; Matt 22:17-21Ultimate authority resides with God;Trust in Jesus
1bPr 8:15; Dan 2:21; 1Ki 10:9; Is 42:8Civil rulers must rule ‘Biblically’ as God’s servants (prefects)Turn to Jesus
1c2Ki 11:17; 1Sam 12:13-15; 1Ki 3:14; 1Sam 15:23Covenantal obedience to God is required by both king and subjectsJesus loves you
1d   Rom 13:1; Is 45:1; Dan 2:37-38God in His sovereignty appoints kings and rulersJesus died for your sins
QuestionScripture Passage(s)16th century Exposition/application by Brutus in Vindicae…Modern Evangelical exposition
1e1Ki 18:3-4; Acts 5:29; Rom 13:5; Eph 6:5-8In all obligations the divine majesty must always be preferredTrust in Jesus
2aJudges 20; Josh 22:10-34; 1Ki 18:19-40;Faithful covenantal practice in the community should be collaborative, the people heeding Godly ministersJesus died for your sins so you can go to heaven
2bEz 18:4; Josh 9; 2Sam 21:1-9; 1Chron 21:1Princes and subjects are separately accountable to God for their actionsJesus has forgiven us
2cJosh 24:15Townships should decide separately whether to comply with princes who abolish true religionChoose Jesus
2dDavid’s sojourn in the wilderness escaping Saul; Jonathan’s special alliance with DavidMay a godly servant withdraw himself from his master’s fury until his heat/anger be past?Jesus saves
2eJn18:11; 1Cor 3:17; Lu 5:37,38Private persons have no power nor public command to unsheathe the sword of authorityHeaven will be wonderful
2fRom 13:4; Lu 3:14; Acts 10:22; Neh 4May Christians legitimately take up arms in for just cause?Love one another

So we see that the difference between authentic biblical Christianity and what passes for it in weekly ‘church meetings’ is like chalk and cheese. This REDUCTION is symptomatic of a more general spiritual reductionism we have suffered incrementally over recent decades (centuries?). Let’s try to summarise this:

Authentic ChristianityREDUCED Contemporary Evangelicalism
God & therefore His Word (Scripture) to inform everything we (i) believe and (ii) doBible informs ‘my spiritual life’; primary focus is getting me/others prepared for heaven.
Since Jesus is King, now reigning & ruling on Mt Zion (Ps 2; Ps 110) the creation mandate (Gen 1:28) may (shall!) now be fulfilled (Matt 28:18)The Creation is cursed; we must wait for Jesus’ return (which could happen any time!) before God’s enemies are defeated
Every human enterprise is to be made subject to God’s Law; all activity is ethicalKnowing God existentially is what really matters; true spirituality is being, not doing
God’s covenant is the key to comprehending providence and history; God blesses covenant keepers & curses covenant breakersBeing ‘saved’ is the key to understanding what redemption in Christ is all about. Grace trumps obedience to rules/commandments; personal commitment is the primary focus
Self-conscious maturity and sanctification evidenced by greater and greater awareness of the possession of a biblical worldviewPersonal ‘spiritual growth’ manifested by ones fidelity and participation in local ‘church’ activities; the (local) church is where the kingdom of God is experienced


Try this ‘acid test’ of your own local church: do the young people in it spend their time between ‘worship services’ reckoning with how Scripture is to inform ALL human enterprise (Heb 5:12-14)? Or are they busy comparing high scores on social media, etc, etc!